Alaska Democrats Blow Away Republicans In New Registrations

(Photos: Courtesy,


Even the best bloggers and prognosticators get it wrong sometimes and I did last week when I posted the voter registration numbers from before and after the Republican and Democratic presidential caucuses. The April posted numbers were correct, however it appears the Alaska Division of Elections had not finished processing all of the registration forms from the Democratic Caucus when they posted the numbers. As a result Alaska Democrats got short changed in the analysis…by a lot.

Here is an updated version of that story with more updated numbers.

Last month was a good one for both major political parties in Alaska, but the numbers show it was a lot better for Democrats than Republicans.donkey-and-elephant

Last month both the Alaska Republican Party and Alaska Democratic Party held their presidential caucuses. Both Republicans and Democrats require caucus participants to be registered members of their party. That means large groups of voters who are registered as “undeclared” or “non-partisan” but want to vote for their favorite candidate such as Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, or Bernie Sanders must register with that candidate’s party to vote for them.

Those party rules allow party insiders the opportunity to gauge their grassroots support by tracking registration changes.

According to the Alaska Division of Elections (DOE) just before the caucuses in March, Alaska had 134,676 registered Republicans, 70,187 Democrats and 275,572 undeclared and non-partisan voters. By mid-April, after the caucuses those numbers had shifted to 139,193 Republicans, 76,137 Democrats, and 269,070 undeclared and non-partisan voters. That marks a significant net increase for both Republicans, at 4,517 (+3.3%) and 5,950 (+8.4%) for Democrats. Undeclared and non-partisan categories dropped 6,502 (-2.3%) voters.

The Democrats, despite having half as many registered party members in Alaska as Republicans, substantially outpaced the Alaska GOP in signing up new voters and convincing undeclared and non-partisan voters to affiliate with the party.

In response to the new numbers Alaska Democratic Party spokesman Jake Hamburg said:

“We are excited so many Alaskans chose to join the Alaska Democratic Party and participate in the presidential caucuses. It’s no secret that caucuses are more involved than casting a ballot. The record turnout and new registrations shows our presidential candidates have generated enthusiasm across the political spectrum. We hope these party newcomers take advantage of the opportunities to get more involved and shape the direction of the party. We’re already encouraged to see a number of new Democrats serving as delegates to the state convention and seeking to become delegates to the national convention. “

The only conclusion that can be drawn from these new numbers is that Presidential candidate Bernie Sanders, who won the Alaska Democratic Caucus with 81% of the vote, has a far more motivated base in Alaska among those outside of the current party structure than the GOP’s top contenders Ted Cruz and Donald Trump.

The numbers also significantly reverse a long trend in Alaska voter registration numbers that had Alaska Republicans closing in on twice as many registered party members as the Alaska Democrats.

The Alaska Republican Party still leads in overall membership at 27.2% of registered voters, while the Alaska Democratic Party sits at 14.9%.

As usual, vastly more Alaska voters, 52.7%, prefer to align themselves with none of the political parties.

More from TMS

9 Comments on "Alaska Democrats Blow Away Republicans In New Registrations"

  1. It’s one thing to be caught up in an error, but deleting the previous post, along with the deletion of the comments attached, is just typical whitewashing of your own content.

    It’s not the first time you’ve chosen to selectively alter your content by removing material.

    What? The comments were not in line with, or reflective of the altered reality you prefer to present? Better to remove awkward inconsistencies which don’t support your wholly constructed narrative?

    • Casey Reynolds | April 27, 2016 at 10:37 am | Reply

      What are you talking about? The previous post wasn’t deleted.

      • … then why doesn’t that entry and others appear in the archives?

        • Casey Reynolds | April 27, 2016 at 10:46 am | Reply

          It does, “

          • …clicking on the April ‘archives’ did not, and still does not produce that entry.

            Presenting an incomplete ‘archive’, or record of entries, is just one more tool within which some find utility in controlling their constructed narrative.

          • Casey Reynolds | April 27, 2016 at 11:04 am |


          • ‘If’ it was simply a matter of ‘my own faulty navigation’, I’ll apologize for my assumption that the entry was not available. I do, in fact, now see page scrolling buttons on either side of the page that I had not previously viewed. If they were there all along, and I’m not claiming they weren’t, then it’s my error.

          • That said, referencing your constructed ‘narrative’, , fear not, it’s status is as yet, still provisional.

          • Casey Reynolds | April 27, 2016 at 12:21 pm |

            Also, the article is up on page two of the archives. Maybe you ask for help using the site next time before making accusations.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published.