Adapted from The Midnight Sun Memo, a newsletter project from your humble Midnight Sun editor. For everyone who’s been asking about keeping up via email or how to support the work we’ve been doing here, we finally have an answer in this nifty newsletter. Sign up now!
It was quite the week to take a break from writing, and Gov. Mike Dunleavy made the most of it by picking his latest losing fight with the courts, with a less-than-transparent budget process, a slate of vetoes that punch down and one big ol’ oopsie. But, hey, at least there’s a silver lining.
Gov. Mike Dunleavy kept everyone waiting on his budget vetoes with the spurious claim that he hardly had any time to review the document that was unchanged since it cleared the Legislature two weeks earlier. He apparently signed the budget on Wednesday, announced his vetoes—including his veto of the PFD—on Thursday and finally transmitted the budget to the Legislature on Friday, where eagle-eyed budget nerds noted that single biggest veto Dunleavy had promoted on Thursday was nowhere to be found in the official budget document. Dunleavy claimed that it was just a simple drafting error that left in place a $4 billion transfer from the Alaska Permanent Fund’s easily spent earnings reserve account (where he’d very much like to overspend about $4 billion on PFDs and “bridge” funding for his less-than-realistic budget plan) to the untouchable corpus of the fund. The Legislature should let it stand anyways, he argued, but the Legislature, which is a fan of the transfer and not much of a fan of Dunleavy, said he wouldn’t get a do-over and, today, Dunleavy relented on the issue, saying he wouldn’t fight the transfer.
“Someone screwed up,” Rep. Andy Josephson told the Anchorage Daily News when the error was discovered last week, “and I believe it’s for the benefit of Alaskans.”
Or, as columnist Dermot Cole put it so well, “Celebrate the reign of error: Dunleavy’s $4 billion boo-boo creates a more financially secure future for Alaskans.”
For a week that has included plenty of troubling developments as the governor turned his veto pen on scores of social safety net programs such as public health nurses, Medicaid, Alaska Legal Services and pre-K grants as well as funding for public broadcasting, the Alaska Marine Highway, tourism marketing and the Alaska Long Trail project, there’s certainly some silver lining to be had in the governor’s failure to veto this transfer. This is $4 billion, a little less than half of the realized earnings in the Alaska Permanent Fund’s earnings reserve after the allocation for government, that will be locked away from legislators hands… forever. In basic terms, every billion dollars in the Alaska Permanent Fund equals about $50 million spendable investment revenue so this represents the state locking in $200 million of annual revenue… forever.
It’s impossible to overlook the fact that the governor’s fiscal plan calls for spending an extra $4 billion from the Alaska Permanent Fund between this year’s PFD and bridge funds to get to when he claims his detail-light long-term fiscal plan will balance. Paying bigger dividends and punting on the hard decisions would have (and still could, depending on how the fall special session goes) resulted in a deficit that’s $200 million larger, meaning whatever measures we use to close it have to be that much bigger.
There’s a price for overspending.
In the near-term, the impacts of the failure may be more nebulous, but it takes a significant chunk of the state’s easily spent savings off the table and with it one of politicians’ preferred ways of making ends meet: Money.
When this whole financial debacle descended on Alaska, I spent a lot of time talking with folks about what it’d take for the Legislature to finally act on a long-term solution to the state’s financial woes as we watched them burn through billions of dollars in the Constitutional Budget Reserve, claiming that next year will be different. One a former legislator told me that as long as there’s easy money out there that legislators will take the easy way out. The only way to really reach a long-term solution, this legislator argued, was to run out of money. This was specifically in context of them arguing in favor of a larger PFD, making the point that it’d have the knock-on effect of burning through the state’s savings that much faster, forcing legislators to make real decisions about the future of state government that much sooner. This, in effect, does just that.
Talking in very oversimplified terms, the transfer leaves about $5 billion of realized earnings left in the earnings reserve account and with several billion dollars more in unrealized earnings. It’s nearing a point where fund managers have warned might not be enough to weather down years (Even during the final days of session, some legislators who had supported the transfer conceded that they may have transferred too much).
So that’s all to say, whatever interest there may have been in overspending the fund in the name of buying votes has likely evaporated as a market correction or inflation or one of the many other boogeymen lurking around the state’s budget could erase billions of dollars in value and make things really difficult, really fast.
Not only does the failure sock away the money, but it also erases whatever buffer there may have been for legislators to hold their noses and vote to overspend on things like the PFD and punting on the hard decisions.
Congratulations, Mr. Dunleavy, you just played yourself.
What is your opinion on the likelihood of the following scenario:
– The “bipartisan” workgroup can’t agree on anything to produce of substance
– The legislature will not find enough votes to compromise on a PFD and overall budget
– There is a zero PFD this year and the governor owns it completely
It’s definitely a non-zero chance at this point. -Matt